Tabita, Maria Emery (2013) Students’ Ways and frequencies of doing initiation-response-feedback moves in a jigsaw reading class. Undergraduate thesis, Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya.
Preview |
Text (ABSTRAK)
Abstrak.pdf Download (982kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text (BAB 1)
Bab 1.pdf Download (156kB) | Preview |
![]() |
Text (BAB 2)
Bab 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (277kB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB 3)
Bab 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (192kB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB 4)
Bab 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (327kB) |
Preview |
Text (BAB 5)
Bab 5.pdf Download (444kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text (LAMPIRAN)
Lampiran.pdf Download (366kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study, the writer would like to know the ways of students‟ initiation, response, and feedback in the expert and home teams. Besides, the writer would like to know whether high achievers contributed initiation, response, and feedback more than low ach ievers in the e xpert and home tea ms. The writer recorded students‟ discussion in an expert and home teams. The recordings were transcribed. Then, the transcripts were analyzed based on IRF (Init iation -Response-Feedback). The ways of initiation, response, and feed back were found in the transcript. Next , the writer counted the frequency of students‟ initiat ion, response, and feedback in the e xpert and home tea ms and presented it in table and figure. It is found there we re several ways to initiate, respond and give feedback in the e xpert and ho me tea m. Ways to initiate we re questioning, directing and informing . Severa l ways to respond were replying a question, acknowledging previous initial informat ion, and ma king complet ion to previous information . The ways of giving feedback that the students used in the expert team providing repair, accepting and commenting. It was found that in the expert and home tea m, high achieving students initiated more than lo w achiev ing students. High achieving students in the e xpert and h ome tea m also did mo re response moves than low achieving student. However, low achieving students in the expert and home team did more feedback moves than high achieving students.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Department: | ["eprint_fieldopt_department_Faculty of Teacher Training and Education" not defined] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Init iation-Response-Feedback, Jigsaw |
Subjects: | English Education |
Divisions: | Faculty of Teacher Training and Education > English Education Study Program |
Depositing User: | Users 12 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 25 May 2015 04:57 |
Last Modified: | 25 May 2015 04:57 |
URI: | http://repository.ukwms.ac.id/id/eprint/2415 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |